2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Cases

MANSION PROPERTIES SDN BHD v. SHAM CHIN YEN & ORS
Federal Court, Putrajaya
Rohana Yusuf PCA, Azahar Mohamed CJM, Mohd Zawawi Salleh FCJ
[Civil Appeal No: 02(i)-91-11-2019(P)]
24 November 2020
[2021] 2 MLRA 1

JUDGMENT

Mohd Zawawi Salleh FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This appeal concerns the proper procedure for applications under ss 366 and 368 of the Companies Act 2016 ("CA").

[2] The appeal arose out of the ex parte applications by the appellant under ss 366 and 368 of the CA in respect of a proposed scheme of arrangement between the company and its creditors. In the applications, the appellant sought orders from the High Court to convene a creditors' meeting, to restrain all proceedings against the appellant and subsequently to approve the compromise or arrangement agreed to by a majority at the creditors' meeting.

[3] The question at the heart of this appeal is whether the applications under ss 366 and 368 of the CA should be made ex parte or inter parte.

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

PRESS METAL SARAWAK SDN BHD v. ETIQA TAKAFUL BERHAD
Federal Court, Putrajaya
2016] 5 MLRA 529
[Civil Appeal No: 02(i)-27-04-2015(W)]
15 August 2016 [+]
TAN POOI YEE v. KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA
High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
[2016] 5 MLRH 501
24NCVC-1306-08-2015
18 July 2016 [+]
ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD
Industrial Court, Johor
[2016] 2 MELR 374
16/4-157/15
27 April 2016 [+]
JanuaryFebruaryJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember