KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENYIARAN MALAYSIA & ANOR v. VERTEX BLUE CONSULTING SDN BHD

[2026] 1 MLRA 810
Federal Court, Putrajaya
Abu Bakar Jais PCA, Hasnah Mohammed Hashim CJM, Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera FCJ
[Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-4-02-2025(W)]
12 November 2025

JUDGMENT

Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera FCJ (Majority):

Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff/Respondent, Vertex Blue Consulting Sdn Bhd, is in the business of providing advertising and media services. The Plaintiff was the successful bidder in a tender exercise conducted by RTM to appoint an independent sales agent to carry out the sales of the Advertising Time Slots for its TV2, TVOkey and 33 radio stations ("Tender Exercise"). RTM comes under the purview of the Defendants/Appellants.

[2] The parties then entered into a Concession Agreement dated 4 July 2017 for a period of 5 years ("Concession Agreement").

[3] The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants, in breach of contract, had wrongly terminated the Concession Agreement. Thus, the Plaintiff filed a suit in the High Court seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the Concession Agreement was wrongly terminated, and claiming damages based on losses it had allegedly suffered.

[4] The Defendants denied breach of contract and alleged that it was the Plaintiff who had in fact breached the Concession Agreement by failing to pay the contractually guaranteed minimum sum. Thus, the Defendants contended that the termination of the agreement was lawful, and counterclaimed the sum of RM43,482,881.27 as damages.

The High Court Discovery Orders

[5] At the High Court, the Plaintiff filed two applications under the Rules of Court 2012 for discovery of documents, which may be categorised as:

(a) a General Discovery Application; and

(b) a Specific Discovery Application for six categories of documents.

[6] A Consent Order for general discovery was recorded on 15 October 2019, and the specific discovery application was granted on 4 February 2020.

[7] The Defendants cooperated and gave discovery of the documents sought. The Defendants in fact arranged for the Plaintiff to be present at the RTM premises for the purpose of inspection and production of the documents sought. However, the Plaintiff complained that the Defendants' compliance with both orders was incomplete and unsatisfactory. Consequently, the Plaintiff filed a Further Discovery Application on 8 July 2021, seeking additional documents from the six categories specified earlier. This application was granted on 12 October 2021 ('Order').

Sign up to view full cases Login