DATIN SERI ROSMAH MANSOR v. ATTORNEY GENERAL/PUBLIC PROSECUTOR & ORS

[2022] 6 MLRH 194
High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid J
[Judicial Review Application No: WA-25-411-06-2022]
Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid J

JUDGMENT

Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid J:

Introduction

[1] On 24 June 2022, the applicant filed an ex-parte application for leave to make an application for judicial review under O 53 r 3(1) of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC).

[2] This application for leave is premised on the allegation that the 3rd respondent has no valid fiat to prosecute the applicant since the criminal proceedings commenced on 15 November 2018.

[3] In this application for leave, the applicant seeks the reliefs as follows:

(a) Pengisytiharan/Deklarasi bahawa perlantikan responden ketiga sebagai Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Kanan bagi kes Pendakwa Raya v. Rosmah Binti Mansor yang bermula di Mahkamah Sesyen Jenayah, Kuala Lumpur melalui Kes Jenayah No: WA-62R-54-11-2018 & WA-62R-18-04-2019, dan kemudiannya di Mahkamah Tinggi Jenayah Kuala Lumpur melalui Kes Jenayah No.: WA-45-9-03-2019 & WA- 45-19-07/2019 [[2022] 6 MLRH 53] ('kes solar tersebut'), di bawah s 376(3) dan s 379 Kanun Prosedur Jenayah melalui Surat Perlantikan (fiat) bertarikh 8 Julai 2020 ('fiat versi pertama') oleh responden Pertama, adalah ultra vires, salah di sisi undang-undang (illegal), tidak teratur (irregular), suatu ketidakaturan prosedur (procedural impropriety), dan cacat (defective) di bawah undang-undang yang matan;

Sign up to view full cases Login