MENTERI DALAM NEGERI & ANOR v. CHONG TON SIN & ANOR

[2024] 2 MLRA 67
Court Of Appeal, Putrajaya
Azizah Nawawi, Gunalan Muniandy, Wong Kian Kheong JJCA
[Civil Appeal No: W-01(A)-156-03/2022]
Azizah Nawawi, Gunalan Muniandy, Wong Kian Kheong JJCA

JUDGMENT

Wong Kian Kheong JCA (majority):

[1] On 25 September 2023:

(1) my learned sister, Azizah Haji Nawawi JCA, and I (Majority Coram) had allowed this appeal with costs (Majority Decision); and

(2) my learned brother, Gunalan a/l Muniandy JCA, had given a dissenting opinion.

[2] This judgment (Majority Judgment) provides the reasons for the Majority Decision and a draft of the Majority Judgment has been given to Gunalan a/l Muniandy JCA.

B. Background

[3] The first respondent (1st Respondent) is the sole proprietor of a business named "Gerakbudaya Enterprise" which publishes and distributes books.

[4] The second respondent (2nd Respondent) wrote a book entitled "Gay is OK! A Christian Perspective" (Book) which was published and distributed by the 1st Respondent in September 2013.

[5] The first part of the Book consisted of a compilation of articles written by the 2nd Respondent which had been published in "Malaysiakini" from September 2010 to April 2011.

[6] On 18 February 2020:

(1) an Assistant Enforcement Officer from the Regulatory and Enforcement Division (Enforcement Division) of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), conducted a random inspection of books which were displayed for sale in the 1st Respondent's bookstore in no 2, Jalan Bukit 11/2, 46200 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan; and

(2) the MHA officer bought the Book from the 1st Respondent for a review and examination by MHA under the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA).

[7] With regard to the Book:

(1) the Book was first reviewed and examined by the Enforcement Division;

(2) the Enforcement Division then submitted the Book to the first appellant, Minister of Home Affairs (1st Appellant);

(3) the 1st Appellant had reviewed the contents of the Book and was satisfied that the Book had contained matters which were likely to be prejudicial to:

Sign up to view full cases Login