JUDGMENT

Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz JC:

Introduction

[1] The respondent Wife ("RW") had filed an application (encl 73) to commit the plaintiff Husband ("PH") to prison for contempt of court pursuant to leave granted by this court (encl 68) for alleged failure to comply with the interim order dated 17 February 2017 [(encl 61) - ("the said order")]. PH, in an effort to challenge the said contempt proceeding, subsequently filed an application (encl 82) seeking to set aside/revoked the said leave as granted by this court.

[2] The relevant cause papers and written submissions, are as follows:

(a) Interim order dated 17 February 2017 (encl 61);

(b) Ex parte application for leave to issue committal proceeding filed on 29 March 2017 (encl 68);

(c) The RW's affidavit in support affirmed by V Jayanthi A/P Vasuthavan affirmed on 28 March 2017 (encl 66);

(d) Statement under O 52 r 2 of the Rules of Court 2012 (encl 67);

(e) The RW's additional affidavit in support affirmed by V Jayanthi a/p Vasuthavan on 5 April 2017 (encl 69);

(f) Application for committal dated 14 April 2017 (encl 73);

(g) Statement under O 52 r 3 of the Rules of Court 2012; (encl 74);

(h) The RW's affidavit in support affirmed by V Jayanthi a/p Vasuthavan filed on 14 April 2017 (encl 75);

(i) The order for leave to commit the PH to prison (encl 77);

(j) The PH application dated 15 May 2017 (encl 82);

(k) The PH's affidavit in support affirmed by S Ammaiyappen a/l M Subramaniam on 15 May 2017 (enc. 83);

(l) The RW's affidavit in reply affirmed by V Jayanthi a/p Vasuthavan on 25 May 2017 (encl 85);

(m) Enclosure 91: PH's written submission;

(n) Enclosure 92: RW's written submission;

(o) Enclosure 94: RW's written submission in reply; and